<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1243 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461057</link>
    <description>Where job-worked tin containers are returned to the principal manufacturer and captively consumed without any open-market sale, valuation is not governed by Rule 8 or Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The assessable value must instead be determined under the settled Ujagar Prints principle, using the cost of raw materials plus job charges and the job-worker&#039;s profit. On that basis, the duty was already discharged, and the demand and penalty could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 13:27:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1243 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461057</link>
      <description>Where job-worked tin containers are returned to the principal manufacturer and captively consumed without any open-market sale, valuation is not governed by Rule 8 or Rule 10A of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The assessable value must instead be determined under the settled Ujagar Prints principle, using the cost of raw materials plus job charges and the job-worker&#039;s profit. On that basis, the duty was already discharged, and the demand and penalty could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>