<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Intra Group Service Agreement and Advisory Services Not Taxable as Fees for Technical Services Under India-UK DTAA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86384</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled that receipts for services rendered under the Intra Group Service Agreement do not constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13(4) of the India-UK DTAA, following previous tribunal decisions for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20. Similarly, advisory services provided to RCIPL-including identifying potential buyers, supporting presentation preparation, coordinating marketing, and advising on transaction options-did not satisfy the &quot;make available&quot; clause as they did not transfer technical knowledge, know-how, or skills. The Tribunal found that neither the Assessing Officer nor the DRP adequately reasoned how these services met the &quot;make available&quot; requirement. Consequently, both service fees were held not taxable in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:42:26 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:42:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Intra Group Service Agreement and Advisory Services Not Taxable as Fees for Technical Services Under India-UK DTAA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86384</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled that receipts for services rendered under the Intra Group Service Agreement do not constitute Fees for Technical Services (FTS) under Article 13(4) of the India-UK DTAA, following previous tribunal decisions for AY 2018-19 and 2019-20. Similarly, advisory services provided to RCIPL-including identifying potential buyers, supporting presentation preparation, coordinating marketing, and advising on transaction options-did not satisfy the &quot;make available&quot; clause as they did not transfer technical knowledge, know-how, or skills. The Tribunal found that neither the Assessing Officer nor the DRP adequately reasoned how these services met the &quot;make available&quot; requirement. Consequently, both service fees were held not taxable in India.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:42:26 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>