https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767045 The CESTAT Allahabad set aside the impugned order from the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise & CGST, Noida, and allowed the appeal. The Tribunal found that the demand for service tax on the sale of spares, accessories, and oils, as well as on labor income and target incentives, was inconsistent with established precedents. It was determined that the value of parts used during repair services and incentives for achieving sales targets should not be included in the taxable value of services. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 08:42:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767045 The CESTAT Allahabad set aside the impugned order from the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise & CGST, Noida, and allowed the appeal. The Tribunal found that the demand for service tax on the sale of spares, accessories, and oils, as well as on labor income and target incentives, was inconsistent with established precedents. It was determined that the value of parts used during repair services and incentives for achieving sales targets should not be included in the taxable value of services. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 11 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767045