<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41997</link>
    <description>The court held that excise duty should be levied on the ex-factory prices set by manufacturers, not on prices charged by selling agents, in a case concerning pharmaceutical products. The petitioners successfully argued that duty should be based on ex-factory prices for bona fide sales, not agents&#039; prices, leading to the quashing of previous orders. The court directed the refund of excess duty paid by the petitioners, allowing the respondents to reassess duty based on ex-factory prices. The respondents were instructed to process refund applications promptly and pay the entitled amount to the petitioners within three months, with costs awarded to the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 46 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41997</link>
      <description>The court held that excise duty should be levied on the ex-factory prices set by manufacturers, not on prices charged by selling agents, in a case concerning pharmaceutical products. The petitioners successfully argued that duty should be based on ex-factory prices for bona fide sales, not agents&#039; prices, leading to the quashing of previous orders. The court directed the refund of excess duty paid by the petitioners, allowing the respondents to reassess duty based on ex-factory prices. The respondents were instructed to process refund applications promptly and pay the entitled amount to the petitioners within three months, with costs awarded to the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>