<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 477 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767091</link>
    <description>HC held that the applicant was entitled to transitional input tax credit under Section 140(3) of Chapter XX of the KSGST Act for computers and laptops used to provide services. Because the applicant was not liable to tax or required to register under KVAT, those goods did not qualify as capital goods under Section 2(x) of the KVAT Act and thus fell within Chapter XX&#039;s transitional credit scheme. Petition allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 477 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767091</link>
      <description>HC held that the applicant was entitled to transitional input tax credit under Section 140(3) of Chapter XX of the KSGST Act for computers and laptops used to provide services. Because the applicant was not liable to tax or required to register under KVAT, those goods did not qualify as capital goods under Section 2(x) of the KVAT Act and thus fell within Chapter XX&#039;s transitional credit scheme. Petition allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>