<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 480 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767094</link>
    <description>The HC reviewed a GST registration cancellation case involving address discrepancies. The appellate authority&#039;s order was set aside due to lack of proper reasoning and failure to address the petitioner&#039;s grounds. The court remanded the matter back for fresh consideration, directing the authority to verify business premises documentation and expedite appeal resolution within six weeks, emphasizing due process and reasoned administrative decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 20:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 480 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767094</link>
      <description>The HC reviewed a GST registration cancellation case involving address discrepancies. The appellate authority&#039;s order was set aside due to lack of proper reasoning and failure to address the petitioner&#039;s grounds. The court remanded the matter back for fresh consideration, directing the authority to verify business premises documentation and expedite appeal resolution within six weeks, emphasizing due process and reasoned administrative decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>