<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (7) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41991</link>
    <description>In excise valuation under Tariff Item 27(e), caps, capping charges and latexing were treated as the assessable value, as the classification question was distinguished from Section 4 principles on post-manufacturing expenses. Durable and returnable packing, and secondary or special packing used for transport or supplied at the buyer&#039;s instance, could be excluded on proof, with evidence permitted on confiscation-related packing. Freight, additional sales tax, interest and customer-credit items were also capable of exclusion if supported by material and consistent with valuation rules. The assessment was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh determination with liberty to file deduction statements and evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:05:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (7) TMI 105 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41991</link>
      <description>In excise valuation under Tariff Item 27(e), caps, capping charges and latexing were treated as the assessable value, as the classification question was distinguished from Section 4 principles on post-manufacturing expenses. Durable and returnable packing, and secondary or special packing used for transport or supplied at the buyer&#039;s instance, could be excluded on proof, with evidence permitted on confiscation-related packing. Freight, additional sales tax, interest and customer-credit items were also capable of exclusion if supported by material and consistent with valuation rules. The assessment was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh determination with liberty to file deduction statements and evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>