https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41985 The Court recalled its earlier summary dismissal of the writ petition because the correct facts and relevant papers had not been placed before it, treating the omission as sufficient cause on the peculiar facts to restore the petition to its original number. It also directed the excise authority to issue the challan needed for deposit of the redemption fine and penalty, holding that the absence of an expressly worded prayer for release of the seized gold did not defeat the substance of the request. The review was allowed, the writ petition was restored, and mandamus issued to facilitate deposit and return of the gold. en-us Fri, 23 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:48:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41985 The Court recalled its earlier summary dismissal of the writ petition because the correct facts and relevant papers had not been placed before it, treating the omission as sufficient cause on the peculiar facts to restore the petition to its original number. It also directed the excise authority to issue the challan needed for deposit of the redemption fine and penalty, holding that the absence of an expressly worded prayer for release of the seized gold did not defeat the substance of the request. The review was allowed, the writ petition was restored, and mandamus issued to facilitate deposit and return of the gold. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41985