https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41983 In preventive detention matters, a declaration under Section 9(1) must be supported by the material on which subjective satisfaction is formed, and the detenu must be supplied that material or at least informed that the declaration rests on the same basis as the detention order so an effective representation can be made. A later statement in a counter-affidavit does not cure non-supply or nondisclosure. The document also states that a detention order may fail where the record shows non-application of mind and the authority cannot give a meaningful explanation for delay in initiating proceedings, because an unexplained gap breaks the required nexus between the prejudicial act and the order. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:42:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41983 In preventive detention matters, a declaration under Section 9(1) must be supported by the material on which subjective satisfaction is formed, and the detenu must be supplied that material or at least informed that the declaration rests on the same basis as the detention order so an effective representation can be made. A later statement in a counter-affidavit does not cure non-supply or nondisclosure. The document also states that a detention order may fail where the record shows non-application of mind and the authority cannot give a meaningful explanation for delay in initiating proceedings, because an unexplained gap breaks the required nexus between the prejudicial act and the order. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 10 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41983