<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (12) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461037</link>
    <description>Preventive detention depends on the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction, but the grounds must still be precise, relevant and factually real so the detenu can make an effective representation. Vague or indefinite grounds do not provide a meaningful opportunity to respond, and grounds that are non-existing or demonstrably false may vitiate the detention if they form part of the basis of the order. On the facts, some grounds lacked particulars, one rested on an admitted mistake about a case in which the detenu had already been acquitted, and the remaining grounds were inadequately explained. The detention order was therefore held illegal and unsustainable, and release followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 13:45:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=805087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (12) TMI 71 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461037</link>
      <description>Preventive detention depends on the detaining authority&#039;s subjective satisfaction, but the grounds must still be precise, relevant and factually real so the detenu can make an effective representation. Vague or indefinite grounds do not provide a meaningful opportunity to respond, and grounds that are non-existing or demonstrably false may vitiate the detention if they form part of the basis of the order. On the facts, some grounds lacked particulars, one rested on an admitted mistake about a case in which the detenu had already been acquitted, and the remaining grounds were inadequately explained. The detention order was therefore held illegal and unsustainable, and release followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>