https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766990 A composite sale of a mobile phone with a charger was treated as falling within the relevant VAT classification for cell phones and their parts, because the dispute turned on the factual matrix rather than any broader rule. The Supreme Court accepted the High Court's factual distinction from the precedent relied on, held that no interference was warranted, and left the impugned order undisturbed. It further clarified that the order would not apply where a charger is sold separately, de hors the mobile phone. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766990 A composite sale of a mobile phone with a charger was treated as falling within the relevant VAT classification for cell phones and their parts, because the dispute turned on the factual matrix rather than any broader rule. The Supreme Court accepted the High Court's factual distinction from the precedent relied on, held that no interference was warranted, and left the impugned order undisturbed. It further clarified that the order would not apply where a charger is sold separately, de hors the mobile phone. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766990