<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 378 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766993</link>
    <description>CESTAT Allahabad upheld service tax demand for 2010-14 period against contractor providing services to power utility clients. Tribunal rejected exemption claim under Notification 25/2012-ST, ruling that services to power utility clients (non-government entities) don&#039;t qualify for government organization exemption. Applied reverse charge mechanism limiting contractor&#039;s liability to 50% of tax. Extended limitation period was validly invoked due to appellant&#039;s failure to provide required details, non-registration, and non-filing of returns, establishing suppression of facts with intent to evade tax. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 08:32:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 378 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766993</link>
      <description>CESTAT Allahabad upheld service tax demand for 2010-14 period against contractor providing services to power utility clients. Tribunal rejected exemption claim under Notification 25/2012-ST, ruling that services to power utility clients (non-government entities) don&#039;t qualify for government organization exemption. Applied reverse charge mechanism limiting contractor&#039;s liability to 50% of tax. Extended limitation period was validly invoked due to appellant&#039;s failure to provide required details, non-registration, and non-filing of returns, establishing suppression of facts with intent to evade tax. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>