<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 394 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767009</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned detention order dated 13 Nov 2024, finding a breach of natural justice because no proper show cause notice or personal hearing was accorded and a standard form waiver was ineffective. Following precedent that personal gold jewellery is not liable to confiscation, the court held the seized chain to be personal jewellery and unsustainablely detained. The respondent was directed to release the gold item within four weeks and the petition was disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 394 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767009</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned detention order dated 13 Nov 2024, finding a breach of natural justice because no proper show cause notice or personal hearing was accorded and a standard form waiver was ineffective. Following precedent that personal gold jewellery is not liable to confiscation, the court held the seized chain to be personal jewellery and unsustainablely detained. The respondent was directed to release the gold item within four weeks and the petition was disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>