<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 396 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767011</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging customs orders was entertained despite an alternative appellate remedy because the classification dispute could be decided on the material before the Court and the relevant advance rulings had already attained finality. On classification, the Court accepted the settled moisture-content criterion: advance rulings treated 10% to 15% moisture as raw areca nuts, while moisture below that range indicated roasted areca nuts. As all laboratory reports showed moisture below 10%, the imported goods were treated as roasted areca nuts, the orders-in-original were not sustained, and clearance of the goods was directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 16:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 396 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767011</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging customs orders was entertained despite an alternative appellate remedy because the classification dispute could be decided on the material before the Court and the relevant advance rulings had already attained finality. On classification, the Court accepted the settled moisture-content criterion: advance rulings treated 10% to 15% moisture as raw areca nuts, while moisture below that range indicated roasted areca nuts. As all laboratory reports showed moisture below 10%, the imported goods were treated as roasted areca nuts, the orders-in-original were not sustained, and clearance of the goods was directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>