https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767033 The HC set aside the impugned GST assessment order because it lacked the assessing officer's signature and omitted the DIN. The court followed its prior division-bench ruling that an assessment order must bear the officer's signature and held that statutory provisions could not cure that defect, and it applied the Supreme Court's reasoning that absence of a DIN renders a GST order invalid. The petition was disposed of and the assessment order quashed. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Nov 2025 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767033 The HC set aside the impugned GST assessment order because it lacked the assessing officer's signature and omitted the DIN. The court followed its prior division-bench ruling that an assessment order must bear the officer's signature and held that statutory provisions could not cure that defect, and it applied the Supreme Court's reasoning that absence of a DIN renders a GST order invalid. The petition was disposed of and the assessment order quashed. Case-Laws GST Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=767033