https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41965 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available against an excise classification order, the writ court may decline to examine the merits and direct the party to pursue the appellate remedy. In doing so, it may also protect the appellant's position by excluding the period spent in writ proceedings for limitation purposes and by continuing interim protection for a limited time so that further relief can be sought before the appellate forum. The note concerns classification of MIC Inserts under the Central Excise Tariff and the procedural effect of relegating the dispute to the statutory appellate mechanism without adjudicating the tariff issue. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:44:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41965 Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available against an excise classification order, the writ court may decline to examine the merits and direct the party to pursue the appellate remedy. In doing so, it may also protect the appellant's position by excluding the period spent in writ proceedings for limitation purposes and by continuing interim protection for a limited time so that further relief can be sought before the appellate forum. The note concerns classification of MIC Inserts under the Central Excise Tariff and the procedural effect of relegating the dispute to the statutory appellate mechanism without adjudicating the tariff issue. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 27 Jul 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41965