<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (4) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41951</link>
    <description>An exemption notification under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is examined against the statutory scheme of excise classification and factory-based eligibility. The text states that limiting relief to factories employing not more than 49 workers on any day in the preceding twelve months created a rational class of smaller factories and was not arbitrary or discriminatory. It also states that the notification did not impose a retrospective excise levy, because the duty arose from insertion of Item 68 in the tariff schedule and the preceding-twelve-months criterion operated only as an exemption test.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:52:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (4) TMI 79 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41951</link>
      <description>An exemption notification under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 is examined against the statutory scheme of excise classification and factory-based eligibility. The text states that limiting relief to factories employing not more than 49 workers on any day in the preceding twelve months created a rational class of smaller factories and was not arbitrary or discriminatory. It also states that the notification did not impose a retrospective excise levy, because the duty arose from insertion of Item 68 in the tariff schedule and the preceding-twelve-months criterion operated only as an exemption test.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>