https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41947 Section 437(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was construed to mean that the relevant trial period begins after charge is framed, when evidence is first recorded; pre-charge evidence is excluded from the sixty-day computation. The Magistrate's discretion to refuse bail was held not to be limited to reasons connected only with trial delay, because the provision permits refusal for ordinary bail considerations as well, provided reasons are recorded in writing. On that construction, the bail application was rejected. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:37:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41947 Section 437(6) of the Code of Criminal Procedure was construed to mean that the relevant trial period begins after charge is framed, when evidence is first recorded; pre-charge evidence is excluded from the sixty-day computation. The Magistrate's discretion to refuse bail was held not to be limited to reasons connected only with trial delay, because the provision permits refusal for ordinary bail considerations as well, provided reasons are recorded in writing. On that construction, the bail application was rejected. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 30 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41947