<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41943</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the correct assessment of customs duty under Entry 35 for imported rock phosphate, ordering the refund of excess duty paid by the petitioners. The Department&#039;s refusal to comply with the court&#039;s decision was deemed unjustifiable, leading to the court setting aside the communication rejecting the refund and directing the Deputy Collector to refund the amount claimed by the petitioners within two months, with interest if delayed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 11:26:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41943</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the correct assessment of customs duty under Entry 35 for imported rock phosphate, ordering the refund of excess duty paid by the petitioners. The Department&#039;s refusal to comply with the court&#039;s decision was deemed unjustifiable, leading to the court setting aside the communication rejecting the refund and directing the Deputy Collector to refund the amount claimed by the petitioners within two months, with interest if delayed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>