<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 335 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766950</link>
    <description>Fiscal adjudication cannot remain in abeyance for years without legally sustainable justification, and prolonged unexplained non-adjudication can itself vitiate the proceedings. Here, the record showed no stay of adjudication, yet the authority deferred the matter for an extended period without due expedition. On that basis, the show cause notice and all consequential proceedings, including the order-in-original, were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 08:41:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 335 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766950</link>
      <description>Fiscal adjudication cannot remain in abeyance for years without legally sustainable justification, and prolonged unexplained non-adjudication can itself vitiate the proceedings. Here, the record showed no stay of adjudication, yet the authority deferred the matter for an extended period without due expedition. On that basis, the show cause notice and all consequential proceedings, including the order-in-original, were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>