https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766961 The HC set aside the adjudication order and directed the Department to refund the value of the seized gold to the Petitioner. The Court ordered that the refund be made with interest due to the delay. Additionally, if the payment was not completed by the specified date, the Department would be liable to pay the market value of the gold as of the Supreme Court's dismissal date, along with simple interest. The Court emphasized timely compliance with its directives and outlined specific terms for the Department's actions. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 07 Mar 2025 08:41:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766961 The HC set aside the adjudication order and directed the Department to refund the value of the seized gold to the Petitioner. The Court ordered that the refund be made with interest due to the delay. Additionally, if the payment was not completed by the specified date, the Department would be liable to pay the market value of the gold as of the Supreme Court's dismissal date, along with simple interest. The Court emphasized timely compliance with its directives and outlined specific terms for the Department's actions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766961