https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41935 Writ interference to compel release of imported goods was declined where the description in the bill of entry and the true nature of the goods were disputed, and Customs treated the goods as misdescribed and liable to action under customs law. The court held that, in the presence of contested facts and available statutory remedies, immediate mandamus-style relief was not warranted. The refusal to release the goods was therefore left undisturbed, and the petitioners were directed to pursue the remedy available under the statute. en-us Tue, 08 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:56:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41935 Writ interference to compel release of imported goods was declined where the description in the bill of entry and the true nature of the goods were disputed, and Customs treated the goods as misdescribed and liable to action under customs law. The court held that, in the presence of contested facts and available statutory remedies, immediate mandamus-style relief was not warranted. The refusal to release the goods was therefore left undisturbed, and the petitioners were directed to pursue the remedy available under the statute. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 08 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41935