<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 368 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766983</link>
    <description>Availability of an alternative statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017 was treated as the proper remedy, and the writ petition was disposed of on that basis. The petitioner was given liberty to approach the appellate authority and raise all grounds taken in the writ petition, including the objection relating to double taxation. No judicial determination on the merits of the tax dispute was recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 08:41:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 368 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766983</link>
      <description>Availability of an alternative statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017 was treated as the proper remedy, and the writ petition was disposed of on that basis. The petitioner was given liberty to approach the appellate authority and raise all grounds taken in the writ petition, including the objection relating to double taxation. No judicial determination on the merits of the tax dispute was recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>