https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41933 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a limited company manufacturing fluorescent tubes and electric bulbs, in a case challenging the non-extension of a customs duty exemption notification. The court held that the Government's decision not to extend the benefit due to a lack of authority for retrospective notifications was incorrect. The court quashed the decision and issued a writ of mandamus to reconsider the petitioner's application in light of the judgment. No costs were awarded in this matter. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:51:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41933 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a limited company manufacturing fluorescent tubes and electric bulbs, in a case challenging the non-extension of a customs duty exemption notification. The court held that the Government's decision not to extend the benefit due to a lack of authority for retrospective notifications was incorrect. The court quashed the decision and issued a writ of mandamus to reconsider the petitioner's application in light of the judgment. No costs were awarded in this matter. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 20 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41933