<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (4) TMI 1239 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461012</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against addition of share sale proceeds as unexplained cash credit under Section 68. The AO relied on a generalized investigation report from Kolkata regarding penny stock manipulation without proving the assessee&#039;s specific involvement in price rigging. The tribunal noted that share purchases in earlier years were accepted by revenue, sales occurred through recognized stock exchange platforms, and proceeds were received through banking channels. Since SEBI conducted no inquiry against the assessee and the AO failed to establish manipulation involvement, the sale consideration could not be treated as unexplained cash credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 19:39:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (4) TMI 1239 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461012</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal against addition of share sale proceeds as unexplained cash credit under Section 68. The AO relied on a generalized investigation report from Kolkata regarding penny stock manipulation without proving the assessee&#039;s specific involvement in price rigging. The tribunal noted that share purchases in earlier years were accepted by revenue, sales occurred through recognized stock exchange platforms, and proceeds were received through banking channels. Since SEBI conducted no inquiry against the assessee and the AO failed to establish manipulation involvement, the sale consideration could not be treated as unexplained cash credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>