<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (10) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41929</link>
    <description>Imported dissolved acetylene cylinders were treated as a single commercial article, so the small quantity of saturation gas and acetone integral to their prescribed condition could not be assessed as a separate import under a different tariff item; the separate duty on that component was therefore not sustainable. The project-import classification and related exemption from countervailing duty were unavailable because the statutory precondition of prior registration of the import contract with the proper customs house was not met. As a result, the assessment of the cylinders and the countervailing duty levy were upheld, while only the separate levy on the gas and acetone component was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:40:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (10) TMI 51 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41929</link>
      <description>Imported dissolved acetylene cylinders were treated as a single commercial article, so the small quantity of saturation gas and acetone integral to their prescribed condition could not be assessed as a separate import under a different tariff item; the separate duty on that component was therefore not sustainable. The project-import classification and related exemption from countervailing duty were unavailable because the statutory precondition of prior registration of the import contract with the proper customs house was not met. As a result, the assessment of the cylinders and the countervailing duty levy were upheld, while only the separate levy on the gas and acetone component was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>