<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 63 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41925</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, stating Customs Authorities were justified in disallowing the refund claim due to the limitation period. The appellant was allowed to withdraw the appeal, with the Court clarifying the Customs Tribunal&#039;s order was not flawed. The appellant was advised to seek alternative remedies if the duty payment was made under a mistake of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:23:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 63 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41925</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal under the Customs Act, 1962, stating Customs Authorities were justified in disallowing the refund claim due to the limitation period. The appellant was allowed to withdraw the appeal, with the Court clarifying the Customs Tribunal&#039;s order was not flawed. The appellant was advised to seek alternative remedies if the duty payment was made under a mistake of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>