<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 88 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41924</link>
    <description>A statutory port authority&#039;s demurrage and wharfage interests cannot be prejudiced by issuance of a detention certificate without notice and an opportunity of hearing, because such a direction may affect its recovery rights and statutory lien after clearance of goods. The authority must therefore be treated as a necessary participant before any order impacting its monetary claim is made. Where clearance is permitted on the basis of detention certificates, an undertaking alone is insufficient protection for the port&#039;s dues; the claim should ordinarily be secured by an appropriate bank guarantee, or cash payment if guarantee protection is not furnished.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 88 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41924</link>
      <description>A statutory port authority&#039;s demurrage and wharfage interests cannot be prejudiced by issuance of a detention certificate without notice and an opportunity of hearing, because such a direction may affect its recovery rights and statutory lien after clearance of goods. The authority must therefore be treated as a necessary participant before any order impacting its monetary claim is made. Where clearance is permitted on the basis of detention certificates, an undertaking alone is insufficient protection for the port&#039;s dues; the claim should ordinarily be secured by an appropriate bank guarantee, or cash payment if guarantee protection is not furnished.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>