<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (5) TMI 46 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41922</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed appeals regarding the exclusion of equalised freight in favor of the assessee, upholding a previous judgment. Special leave petitions were also rejected as the matter had been settled against the revenue. The excise authorities will ascertain the permissible amount of equalised freight for exclusion in case of disagreement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (5) TMI 46 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41922</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed appeals regarding the exclusion of equalised freight in favor of the assessee, upholding a previous judgment. Special leave petitions were also rejected as the matter had been settled against the revenue. The excise authorities will ascertain the permissible amount of equalised freight for exclusion in case of disagreement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>