<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interest Disallowance Under Section 36(1)(iii) Rejected As No Proof Of Fund Diversion For Non-Business Purpose</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86292</link>
    <description>ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding interest disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii). AO&#039;s contention of interest-free advances from interest-bearing funds was rejected as AO failed to establish diversion of funds for non-business purposes. Tribunal found substantial interest-free funds available with assessee from sister concerns, exceeding the disputed amount. Regarding stock valuation, ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s partial deletion of addition, maintaining Rs. 50,63,472 for consistency in FIFO method while deleting Rs. 3,95,62,067. On handling/spillage/wastage losses, ITAT accepted natural losses due to environmental factors and handling, noting no adverse findings during search proceedings or in previous assessments. AO&#039;s arbitrary disallowance was set aside as reasonable business losses were established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:35:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:35:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interest Disallowance Under Section 36(1)(iii) Rejected As No Proof Of Fund Diversion For Non-Business Purpose</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86292</link>
      <description>ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding interest disallowance under Section 36(1)(iii). AO&#039;s contention of interest-free advances from interest-bearing funds was rejected as AO failed to establish diversion of funds for non-business purposes. Tribunal found substantial interest-free funds available with assessee from sister concerns, exceeding the disputed amount. Regarding stock valuation, ITAT upheld CIT(A)&#039;s partial deletion of addition, maintaining Rs. 50,63,472 for consistency in FIFO method while deleting Rs. 3,95,62,067. On handling/spillage/wastage losses, ITAT accepted natural losses due to environmental factors and handling, noting no adverse findings during search proceedings or in previous assessments. AO&#039;s arbitrary disallowance was set aside as reasonable business losses were established.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:35:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=86292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>