https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766872 Where an earlier order had been set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication, no subsisting demand existed for appropriation or adjustment of the sanctioned rebate. The adjustment of rebate against the alleged demand was therefore not legally sustainable, and the department's reliance on other authorities was treated as factually distinguishable and rejected. en-us Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:34:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766872 Where an earlier order had been set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication, no subsisting demand existed for appropriation or adjustment of the sanctioned rebate. The adjustment of rebate against the alleged demand was therefore not legally sustainable, and the department's reliance on other authorities was treated as factually distinguishable and rejected. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766872