https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766874 CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on GTA services and clearing and forwarding agency services for goods sold on FOR basis. The Tribunal relied on precedent from Ramco Cements Ltd. case, determining eligibility based on place of removal facts. Additionally, since proceedings were not initiated against the Input Service Distributor who issued the invoices, CENVAT credit could not be denied to the appellant. The impugned order was set aside with no penalty imposed. en-us Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:35:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766874 CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on GTA services and clearing and forwarding agency services for goods sold on FOR basis. The Tribunal relied on precedent from Ramco Cements Ltd. case, determining eligibility based on place of removal facts. Additionally, since proceedings were not initiated against the Input Service Distributor who issued the invoices, CENVAT credit could not be denied to the appellant. The impugned order was set aside with no penalty imposed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766874