<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 261 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766876</link>
    <description>Where excisable clinkers are transferred to sister concerns for captive use but part of the production is also sold to independent buyers, valuation follows Rule 4 read with Rule 11 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, not Rule 8. The text treats the statutory valuation scheme under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act as controlling and notes that later amendment No. 14/2013-CE (NT) did not change the position for the period in dispute. Revenue neutrality is described only as relevant to intention and not as a substitute for the prescribed valuation method. Penalty was considered unsustainable in this valuation dispute and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 261 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766876</link>
      <description>Where excisable clinkers are transferred to sister concerns for captive use but part of the production is also sold to independent buyers, valuation follows Rule 4 read with Rule 11 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, not Rule 8. The text treats the statutory valuation scheme under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act as controlling and notes that later amendment No. 14/2013-CE (NT) did not change the position for the period in dispute. Revenue neutrality is described only as relevant to intention and not as a substitute for the prescribed valuation method. Penalty was considered unsustainable in this valuation dispute and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>