<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 263 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766878</link>
    <description>The extended period of limitation for central excise demand on performance incentive received from buyers was held not invokable because the adjudicating authority had already found no fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty, and that finding had attained finality. On that basis, the ingredients required to justify extended limitation were absent, so the demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 263 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766878</link>
      <description>The extended period of limitation for central excise demand on performance incentive received from buyers was held not invokable because the adjudicating authority had already found no fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade duty, and that finding had attained finality. On that basis, the ingredients required to justify extended limitation were absent, so the demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>