<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 64 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41901</link>
    <description>An exemption for ocean-going vessels was qualified by a proviso making the vessel chargeable to customs duty if it was later broken up, so the exemption was not permanent and ceased to operate on breaking up. For duty computation under that proviso, the relevant rate was the rate applicable on the vessel&#039;s original date of importation, not a later date linked to filing or noting customs papers. The excess duty collected on a later-rate basis was therefore liable to refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 09:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 64 - HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41901</link>
      <description>An exemption for ocean-going vessels was qualified by a proviso making the vessel chargeable to customs duty if it was later broken up, so the exemption was not permanent and ceased to operate on breaking up. For duty computation under that proviso, the relevant rate was the rate applicable on the vessel&#039;s original date of importation, not a later date linked to filing or noting customs papers. The excess duty collected on a later-rate basis was therefore liable to refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>