https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766891 The CESTAT Kolkata addressed three main issues. First, it condoned the delay in filing appeals, finding the reasons satisfactory. Second, it rejected the Revenue's application for a stay, determining that the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order was neither illegal nor without jurisdiction. Third, regarding the classification of imported goods, the Tribunal upheld the previous decision favoring the respondent, citing a settled issue in the appellant's own case. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, reinforcing established principles under the Customs Tariff Act. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:35:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766891 The CESTAT Kolkata addressed three main issues. First, it condoned the delay in filing appeals, finding the reasons satisfactory. Second, it rejected the Revenue's application for a stay, determining that the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order was neither illegal nor without jurisdiction. Third, regarding the classification of imported goods, the Tribunal upheld the previous decision favoring the respondent, citing a settled issue in the appellant's own case. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, reinforcing established principles under the Customs Tariff Act. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 20 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766891