<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 295 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766910</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on surplus funds placed in bank deposits was not fully deductible under section 80P. The Tribunal held that the society was not a co-operative bank, so the ruling in Nawanshahar Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. and the CBDT circular relied on by the assessee did not apply. It accepted the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s restricted relief, which allowed deduction only to the extent linked to the reserve amount required under the State Societies Act and permitted related expenditure against interest treated as income from other sources. No further deduction was available on the disputed bank interest, and the partial allowance was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 295 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766910</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative credit society on surplus funds placed in bank deposits was not fully deductible under section 80P. The Tribunal held that the society was not a co-operative bank, so the ruling in Nawanshahar Central Cooperative Bank Ltd. and the CBDT circular relied on by the assessee did not apply. It accepted the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s restricted relief, which allowed deduction only to the extent linked to the reserve amount required under the State Societies Act and permitted related expenditure against interest treated as income from other sources. No further deduction was available on the disputed bank interest, and the partial allowance was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>