<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1578 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460994</link>
    <description>Where the same assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 11 had already been consistently accepted in earlier years on the same facts, the HC held that no substantial question of law arose under section 260A. The Tribunal&#039;s view granting charitable status and exemption was in line with those prior decisions, and no fresh legal issue justifying interference was shown. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 07:32:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=804250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1578 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460994</link>
      <description>Where the same assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under section 11 had already been consistently accepted in earlier years on the same facts, the HC held that no substantial question of law arose under section 260A. The Tribunal&#039;s view granting charitable status and exemption was in line with those prior decisions, and no fresh legal issue justifying interference was shown. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>