https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460981 A transfer executed in deliberate breach of subsisting injunction and status quo orders was treated as void ab initio and not binding, and the Court held it could restore the status quo ante through its inherent powers without requiring contempt proceedings. A bare restraint against alienation did not create a charge over the flat because there was no obligation to pay money out of the property, and the objection that cancellation relief exceeded the plaint was rejected. The offending agreement was set aside, cancellation was directed, and possession was ordered through the Court Receiver. en-us Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 18:57:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460981 A transfer executed in deliberate breach of subsisting injunction and status quo orders was treated as void ab initio and not binding, and the Court held it could restore the status quo ante through its inherent powers without requiring contempt proceedings. A bare restraint against alienation did not create a charge over the flat because there was no obligation to pay money out of the property, and the objection that cancellation relief exceeded the plaint was rejected. The offending agreement was set aside, cancellation was directed, and possession was ordered through the Court Receiver. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460981