<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (1) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41886</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that re-rubberising and relining of old vessels did not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; under the Central Excises and Salt Act, both before and after the specified date of 14th March, 1986. The appellant was entitled to a refund of duties collected as the law remained unchanged. The Court directed the refund claim to be resolved within three months without costs, rejecting the Solicitor General&#039;s argument on the issue of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (1) TMI 86 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41886</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that re-rubberising and relining of old vessels did not amount to &#039;manufacture&#039; under the Central Excises and Salt Act, both before and after the specified date of 14th March, 1986. The appellant was entitled to a refund of duties collected as the law remained unchanged. The Court directed the refund claim to be resolved within three months without costs, rejecting the Solicitor General&#039;s argument on the issue of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>