<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (3) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41883</link>
    <description>The excise account-maintenance scheme under Rule 173G(4) read with Rules 53 and 226 required recording of production, storage and materials received or consumed, but it did not expressly demand instantaneous entry of raw materials in Form IV on arrival in the factory. The Court held that Form IV could be maintained as a running, date-wise account with balances taken at the end of working hours, and in the absence of a clear statutory requirement for immediate receipt entry, non-compliance was not established. Confiscation, penalty and revisional orders were therefore unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:06:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=80412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (3) TMI 113 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41883</link>
      <description>The excise account-maintenance scheme under Rule 173G(4) read with Rules 53 and 226 required recording of production, storage and materials received or consumed, but it did not expressly demand instantaneous entry of raw materials in Form IV on arrival in the factory. The Court held that Form IV could be maintained as a running, date-wise account with balances taken at the end of working hours, and in the absence of a clear statutory requirement for immediate receipt entry, non-compliance was not established. Confiscation, penalty and revisional orders were therefore unsustainable and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>