https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460980 Article 91 of the Limitation Act governs a suit seeking to avoid leases allegedly procured by undue influence, even where possession is also claimed. A possession claim cannot bypass limitation where it depends on first cancelling or setting aside the leases; the avoidance relief is time-barred if not pursued within the prescribed period. Voidable leases cannot be eliminated by unilateral repudiation when the claimant seeks possession as plaintiff. Judicial rescission or cancellation is required before possession can be recovered. The Trusts Act and Contract Act do not remove the requirement to obtain judicial relief within limitation, and constructive-trust arguments do not create an immediately enforceable title without such declaration. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 1913 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 14:56:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460980 Article 91 of the Limitation Act governs a suit seeking to avoid leases allegedly procured by undue influence, even where possession is also claimed. A possession claim cannot bypass limitation where it depends on first cancelling or setting aside the leases; the avoidance relief is time-barred if not pursued within the prescribed period. Voidable leases cannot be eliminated by unilateral repudiation when the claimant seeks possession as plaintiff. Judicial rescission or cancellation is required before possession can be recovered. The Trusts Act and Contract Act do not remove the requirement to obtain judicial relief within limitation, and constructive-trust arguments do not create an immediately enforceable title without such declaration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Mar 1913 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460980