https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41868 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing clearance of goods described as artificial fur cloth despite initial refusal by Customs Authorities. Expert opinions supported the petitioner's claim that the goods were not velvet but fell under the broader category of artificial fur cloth. The court emphasized the importance of consistent classification tests and directed authorities to clear the goods with specified conditions. This case underscores the significance of expert opinions in resolving disputes over the classification of imported goods. en-us Thu, 29 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:15:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41868 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing clearance of goods described as artificial fur cloth despite initial refusal by Customs Authorities. Expert opinions supported the petitioner's claim that the goods were not velvet but fell under the broader category of artificial fur cloth. The court emphasized the importance of consistent classification tests and directed authorities to clear the goods with specified conditions. This case underscores the significance of expert opinions in resolving disputes over the classification of imported goods. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=41868