https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460970 The HC concluded that it had jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 to review and correct examination evaluations, even without explicit re-evaluation provisions in CBSE regulations. The court found that the appellant's answers were correct and awarded her two additional marks. Consequently, the court directed that the appellant be admitted to the MBBS course in the next academic session, emphasizing that procedural delays should not prevent relief when the appellant acted promptly and was entitled to it. This decision underscores the court's authority to ensure justice by reviewing expert evaluations. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 10:42:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460970 The HC concluded that it had jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 to review and correct examination evaluations, even without explicit re-evaluation provisions in CBSE regulations. The court found that the appellant's answers were correct and awarded her two additional marks. Consequently, the court directed that the appellant be admitted to the MBBS course in the next academic session, emphasizing that procedural delays should not prevent relief when the appellant acted promptly and was entitled to it. This decision underscores the court's authority to ensure justice by reviewing expert evaluations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460970