https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460969 A petition under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to challenge a revisional order of the Sessions Court in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, because that would amount to a second revision and is not maintainable. The Court also held that a belated request to send the cheque for handwriting expert opinion on the age of the signature and writings was properly refused, as the application appeared designed to delay proceedings and the admitted execution of the cheque made the identity of the person filling the body of the instrument immaterial to liability under the NI Act. The trial was directed to proceed expeditiously, with costs imposed for misuse of process. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 10:21:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460969 A petition under Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to challenge a revisional order of the Sessions Court in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, because that would amount to a second revision and is not maintainable. The Court also held that a belated request to send the cheque for handwriting expert opinion on the age of the signature and writings was properly refused, as the application appeared designed to delay proceedings and the admitted execution of the cheque made the identity of the person filling the body of the instrument immaterial to liability under the NI Act. The trial was directed to proceed expeditiously, with costs imposed for misuse of process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Dec 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=460969