https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766794 Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 weighed against writ interference, so the writ petition was held not maintainable and the petitioners were directed to pursue the appellate remedy. On jurisdiction, the Authority could entertain complaints even though the project was said to be unregistered and the complainants were alleged not to be allottees, because the Act permits an aggrieved person to complain, applies broad definitions of promoter and allottee, and empowers the Authority to issue directions in such disputes. The challenge based on lack of registration and locus therefore failed, and the impugned order was found free from jurisdictional error. en-us Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766794 Availability of an efficacious statutory appeal under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 weighed against writ interference, so the writ petition was held not maintainable and the petitioners were directed to pursue the appellate remedy. On jurisdiction, the Authority could entertain complaints even though the project was said to be unregistered and the complainants were alleged not to be allottees, because the Act permits an aggrieved person to complain, applies broad definitions of promoter and allottee, and empowers the Authority to issue directions in such disputes. The challenge based on lack of registration and locus therefore failed, and the impugned order was found free from jurisdictional error. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 30 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766794