https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766795 In a cheque-based money suit, proof of the loan transaction and execution of the cheque triggered statutory presumptions in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant failed to rebut those presumptions with credible evidence, as the plaintiff's version remained intact in cross-examination and the defendant did not testify. The decree founded on the cheque was therefore sustained. The court also held that remand for additional evidence is not available merely to fill gaps in a party's case, and no sufficient ground existed for a retrial because the record already contained adequate material for decision. The request for remand was rejected. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766795 In a cheque-based money suit, proof of the loan transaction and execution of the cheque triggered statutory presumptions in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant failed to rebut those presumptions with credible evidence, as the plaintiff's version remained intact in cross-examination and the defendant did not testify. The decree founded on the cheque was therefore sustained. The court also held that remand for additional evidence is not available merely to fill gaps in a party's case, and no sufficient ground existed for a retrial because the record already contained adequate material for decision. The request for remand was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766795