<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 182 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766797</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a complaint must allege that the accused directors were in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business at the relevant time. Once that basic averment is made, quashing under Section 482 CrPC is not ordinarily available unless the accused produce unimpeachable and uncontroverted material showing non-involvement. Mere reliance on disputed resignation documents or other factual assertions is insufficient where the resignation&#039;s effectiveness and the directors&#039; responsibility remain contested. The Court held that these questions required trial, and the challenge to the summoning orders was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 182 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766797</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, a complaint must allege that the accused directors were in charge of and responsible for the company&#039;s business at the relevant time. Once that basic averment is made, quashing under Section 482 CrPC is not ordinarily available unless the accused produce unimpeachable and uncontroverted material showing non-involvement. Mere reliance on disputed resignation documents or other factual assertions is insufficient where the resignation&#039;s effectiveness and the directors&#039; responsibility remain contested. The Court held that these questions required trial, and the challenge to the summoning orders was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766797</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>