<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 183 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766798</link>
    <description>Section 210 CrPC does not stay a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint when the pending police case concerns distinct offences with different factual foundations, ingredients, causes of action and objects. The High Court noted that allegations of misappropriation and cheating in the police case were separate from the cheque dishonour proceeding, and the disputed circumstances of cheque execution were matters for trial in the complaint case. Finding no illegality, irregularity or jurisdictional error in the Magistrate&#039;s refusal to call for a police report and stay the complaint, the Court declined interference under Section 482 CrPC and allowed the complaint to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 183 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766798</link>
      <description>Section 210 CrPC does not stay a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint when the pending police case concerns distinct offences with different factual foundations, ingredients, causes of action and objects. The High Court noted that allegations of misappropriation and cheating in the police case were separate from the cheque dishonour proceeding, and the disputed circumstances of cheque execution were matters for trial in the complaint case. Finding no illegality, irregularity or jurisdictional error in the Magistrate&#039;s refusal to call for a police report and stay the complaint, the Court declined interference under Section 482 CrPC and allowed the complaint to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>