<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 192 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766807</link>
    <description>Disclosure of clearance documents to the department, including Sectional Debit Advices filed with RT-12 returns, meant suppression, fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement and intent to evade duty were not established; the extended period of limitation was therefore unsustainable and the penalty could not be upheld. Any duty liability for the normal period, however, remained open to be examined and confirmed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 07:49:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=803880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 192 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766807</link>
      <description>Disclosure of clearance documents to the department, including Sectional Debit Advices filed with RT-12 returns, meant suppression, fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement and intent to evade duty were not established; the extended period of limitation was therefore unsustainable and the penalty could not be upheld. Any duty liability for the normal period, however, remained open to be examined and confirmed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=766807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>